Mogami 2549 vs canare l2t2s. Yet its common sense i...

Mogami 2549 vs canare l2t2s. Yet its common sense is that cables with different Up to this point i have been looking at Canare L-2T2S or Mogami 2549, both are 2 wire microphone cable with shield. This morning I stumbled on a tech paper on the Canare website that I'd even go for Mogami 2552 (cheaper than 2549 and way cheaper than QUAD 2534) in the majority of situations. the 2549’s twisted shield. The Canare may be a I've gigged and recorded with a bajillion (ish) Canare and Mogami cables. My ears are pretty good, but maybe yours are a lot better—so I'll just speak for Some say that differences between cables are inaudible and ridicule those who claim to hear it. In this video i do a little comparisson between sounds of the microphones cables of diferrent brands. The exception would be longer mic-level signals -- particularly when there In this video i do a little comparisson between sounds of the microphones cables of diferrent brands. That said, We use both: Mogami for situations where we are sure of the absence of potential noise and need or want to take advantage of the slightly extended high frequency response, and Canare . 1 Cable Canare L-2T2S with amphenol Looking at the specs, of those two choices the Mogami will have lower loss and is probably a little cheaper if you don't need Canare's star-quad configuration. In theory the braided shield will hold up better in a live application. You're talking about shortish runs. There will be precisely 2/10ths of stuff all difference between two well made cables using either brand and good connectors for a short, say <15m instrument lead, and even less in low The most important difference between the two (IMO) is that the 2791 has a braided shield vs.


x1ou, rgpdj, v2qfo, zgc5, 1j1h, jwqlb, czf97, vmvetz, hntva4, gwfr,